The Clinical Efficacy Analysis of Surgery and Non-surgical in the Treatment of Basal Ganglia Hemorrhage Caused by Hypertension

Abstract：Objective:To compare and investigate the differences of clinical efficacy of surgery and non-surgical in the treatment of hypertension caused by basal ganglia hemorrhage through the experiment.Method:100 basal ganglia hemorrhage patients caused by hypertension admitted to our hospital from April 2013 to April 2014 were selected,they were divided into the surgery group and the non-surgical group according to the patients chose whether or not to operation treatment,50 cases in each group.The surgery group was treated with CT positioning under temporal drilling catheter drainage combined with drug therapy,the surgical group was only treated with drug therapy.The short term and long term effects between the two groups were observed and compared.Result:There was no statistically significant difference in the proportion of two groups during treatment because of the increased amount of bleeding into undergoing craniotomy(P>0.05). The incidence of secondary pulmonary infection and stress ulcer in surgery group were significantly lower than those in non-surgical group,the hospitalization time of surgery group was significantly shorter than non-surgical group,the satisfaction of Barthel score in surgery group was 70.0%(35/50),it was significantly higher than 50.0%(25/50) of non-surgical group,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion:In the treatment of the basal ganglia hemorrhage patients caused by hypertension,the short term and long term effects of surgical treatment are superior to non-surgical treatment,surgical treatment is recommended clinical preferred in the treatment of the basal ganglia hemorrhage patients caused by hypertension.