Comparison between Minimally Invasive Extraction and Traditonal Extraction on Impacted Mandibular Molars
CHEN Jian-jun
HUANG Jing
YANG Da-jiang
Abstract： Objective:To observe the difference between minimally invasive extraction and traditonal extraction on impacted mandibular molars.Methods:120 cases of patients,which provided the main indication for extraction,were randomly divided into two groups.Impacted mandibular molars in minimally invasive extraction group were extracted with high speed turbine drill and luxator,while teeth in traditional group were extracted with traditonal method with orthodox chisel. The fear rate,deformation of extraction wound and patient’s reaction after surgery(including the rate of pain and swelling) were compared between the two groups. Results:Fear rate,deformation of extraction wound and patient’s reaction after surgery(including the rate of pain and swelling) of minimally invasive extraction group was far less than that of traditonal extraction group,and the difference between two groups was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion:Minimally invasive extraction on impacted mandibular molars is superior to traditional method,which should be generalized in clinical application.
Keywords：Minimally invasive extractionImpacted mandibular molarsExtraction
Publication Date：2013-01-01
Online Publishing Date：2025-08-15(First online date of this platform, not the publication date of the document)
Pages：2( 19-20 )