Longitudinal intussusception versus end-to-side vasoepididymostomy:Comparison of their recanalization rates
ZHAO Lu-gang
CHEN Hong
LIU Gui-hua
FANG Cong
LIANG Xiao-yan
ZHANG Jing
Abstract:Objective:To compare the recanalization rate of 2-suture longitudinal intussusception vasoepididymostomy(LIVE)with that of4-suture end-to-side vasoepididymostomy(ESVE).Methods:This retrospective case-control study included 127 cases of obstructive azoospermia(OA)treated by LIVE(n=87)or ESVE(n=40)in our Center of Reproductive Medicine from October 2013 to July 2024.We analyzed the clinical data and compared the age,testis volume,level of serum follicle-stimulating hormone(FSH),operation time and postoperative recanalization rate between the two groups.Results:Spermatozoa were observed in 90(70.9%)of the 127 cases after surgery.There were no statistical differences in age,testis volume and FSH between the two groups of patients(all P>0.05),and nor were there any serious surgical complications.The operation time was significantly longer in the ESVE than in the LIVE group(22.0[20.0-25.8]vs 17.0[15.0-23.0]min,P<0.05),while the postoperative recanalization rate remarkably higher in the former than in the latter group(85.0%vs 64.4%,P<0.05).Vasoepididymostomy was performed at the caput epididymis in 11 cases,with a higher recanalization rate in the ESVE than in the LIVE group(50.0%[1/2]vs 33.3%[3/9]).Conclusion:ESVE achieved a higher postoperative recanalization rate than LIVE in the treatment of OA,but its advanta-ges need further investigation.
Keywords:obstructive azoospermiavasoepididymostomy2-suture longitudinal intussusceptions vasoepididymostomyend-to-side vasoepididymostomymicrosurgeryrecanalization rate
Publication Date:2024-11-20
Online Publishing Date:2025-08-15(First online date of this platform, not the publication date of the document)
Pages:7( 1002-1008 )
National Journal of Andrology

National Journal of Andrology

ISTICCSCD
ISSN:1009-3591
Year, Vol.(Issue):2024,30(11)