Comparative analysis of perineal incision and unprotected perineal childbirth
LIN Lan
LIN Wei-ling
XU Shao-min
Abstract:Objective To perform the comparative analysis of perineal incision and unprotected perineal childbirth. Methods A retrospective analysis of 200 cases of vaginal delivery in our hospital from April 2015 to May 2016 was preformed in this study. According to the different methods of delivery that the patients received,they were divided into the perineal incision group and the unprotected group,with 100 cases in each group. The perineal incision group received traditional protection of the perineal method and the unprotected group received unprotected perineum natural vaginal delivery. The degree of perineal rupture and the post-delivery results were compared between the two groups. Results The degree of perineum of the unprotected group was significantly less than that of the perineal incision group(P < 0. 05). There were no significant differences in the second delivery time and Apgar scores between the two groups(P > 0. 05). The postpartum 2 h blood loss of the unprotected group was significantly less than that of the perineal incision group(P < 0. 05), The maternal satisfaction scores of the unprotected group were significantly higher than those of the perineal incision group(P < 0. 05). Conclusion The unprotected perineal childbirth method reduces more degree of perineal fracture and more amount of postpartum 2 h blood loss and improves more maternal satisfaction than the perineal incision method.
Keywords:Perineal incisionUnprotected perineal childbirthPerineal laceration
Publication Date:2018-01-01
Online Publishing Date:2025-08-15(First online date of this platform, not the publication date of the document)
Pages:3( 439-441 )
