Comparison in safety and effectiveness between TR Band hemostat and RDP-700 hemostat after perradial coronary intervention

ZHAO Bing; LI Jun-xia; BAO Hong-gang

doi:10.3969/j.1674-4055.2015.04.35

Abstract：Objective To compare the safety and effectiveness between TR Band hemostat and RDP-700 hemostat after perradial coronary intervention. Methods The patients (n=180) with coronary heart disease (CHD) undergone perradial coronary angiography and stenting were chosen and divided into TR Band group and RDP-700 group (each n=90). These 2 groups were given respectively TR Band hemostat and RDP-700 hemostat for radial hemostasis during perradial stenting. The hemostatic effect, oppression hemostatic time, swelling subsided time of distal limbs, oxygen saturation of the thumb in oppression side, obliteration rate of radial artery, and incidence of arm local swelling and skin ischemia and necrosis were observed and compared in 2 groups. Results TR Band hemostat and RDP-700 hemostat all had good hemostatic effects. The oppression hemostatic time was significantly shorter in RDP-700 group (6.62±0.65) h than that in TR Band group (9.12±0.58) h (P<0.05). The swelling subsided time of distal limbs was significantly shorter in RDP-700 group (12.17±1.31) h than that in TR Band group (20.10±2.41) h (P<0.05). The monitoring of oxygen saturation showed normal in 2 groups and difference had no statistical significance (P>0.05). The difference in obliteration rate of radial artery and incidence of skin ischemia and necrosis had no statistical significance between 2 groups (P<0.05). Conclusion TR Band hemostat and RDP-700 hemostat are safe and effective applied after perradial stenting, and RDP-700 hemostat has characteristics of shorter oppression hemostatic time and shorter swelling subsided time of distal limbs.