Comparison between laparoendoscopic single-site myomectomy with the"chopstick"technique and conventional laparoscopic myomectomy
WU Xue-ju
WEI Huan-yu
DENG Yuan
DENG Li
TANG Shuai
WANG Yan-zhou
Abstract:Objective To compare the perioperative outcomes of laparoendoscopic single-site myomectomy using the"chopstick"technique(cLESS-M)with those of conventional laparoscopic myomectomy(CLS-M).Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on 255 patients who underwent laparoscopic myomectomy at the First Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University between August 2018 and April 2020.Patients were divided into the cLESS group(n=117)and the CLS group(n=138)based on the surgical approach.Intraoperative parameters,postoperative recovery indicators,and incidence of perioperative complications were compared between the two groups.Results Baseline data were similar between the two groups(P>0.05).There were no significant differences in operation time,estimated blood loss,or incidence of perioperative complications.Compared to the CLS group,the cLESS group had a significantly shorter postoperative hospital stay[4.0(4.0,5.0)vs.5.0(4.0,6.0)days,P=0.006],lower pain scores at 1 hour postoperatively[2.0(2.0,3.0)vs.3.0(2.0,3.0),P<0.001],and lower pain scores at 24 hours after operation[1.0(1.0,1.0)vs.1.0(1.0,2.0),P=0.008].Conclusion The cLESS-M technique offers comparable surgical outcomes to CLS-M,with advantages of shorter hospital stay and less pain after operation.
Keywords:uterine myomalaparoendoscopic single-site surgerychopstick techniquelaparoscopic myomectomy
Publication Date:2025-07-02
Online Publishing Date:2025-08-19(First online date of this platform, not the publication date of the document)
Pages:4( 730-733 )
Chinese Journal of Practical Gynecology and Obstetrics

Chinese Journal of Practical Gynecology and Obstetrics

ISTICPKUCSCD
ISSN:1005-2216
Year, Vol.(Issue):2025,41(7)