DOI: 10.12307/2025.271
Advantages of modified ligation method for spinal cord injury modeling
Li Daohui
Xu Xiaoshuang
Li Zhengtao
Tian Xinpeng
Bi Hangchuan
Liu Yuan
Dai Yongwen
Chen Lingqiang
Abstract:BACKGROUND:Currently,different methods of model establishment have been derived from different injury modes of spinal cord injury.Traditional physical injury modeling methods have their own advantages and disadvantages,and there is a lack of more effective and stable animal models of spinal cord injury.
OBJECTIVE:To establish a reproducible,controllable,trauma-free,low-mortality,more stable,widely applicable,and short-term postoperative care rat model of spinal cord injury.
METHODS:Forty Sprague-Dawley rats with similar body mass and ages were randomly divided into a control group and an improved group,with 20 rats in each group.Animal models of spinal cord injury in the control group were constructed using a clip model method,while the improved group used a modified ligation method based on the compression method to make the spinal cord injury models using suture ligation based on fenestration.Postoperative comparisons were made between the two groups,assessing urination behavior,hematuria,pyuria(infection rate),mortality,scoliosis rate and Basso-Beattie-Bresnahan locomotor rating scale scores at 1,3,5,and 7 days after modeling.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:Compared with the conventional modeling method,the modified ligation method based on the compression method resulted in faster recovery of urination behavior,lower hematuria rate,lower infection rate,lower mortality rate,lower scoliosis rate,and more concentrated and stable Basso-Beattie-Bresnahan scores(all below 2 points within 1 week).This proves that the modified ligation method based on compression is more suitable for the establishment of spinal cord injury models in rats.
Keywords:improvementspinal cord injury modelclip model methodligation methodurination reflexurination behaviorscoliosisBBB score
Publication Date:2025-01-11
Online Publishing Date:2025-08-15(First online date of this platform, not the publication date of the document)
Pages:6( 379-384 )
