Comparision of two methods of Shang Ring circumcision:no-flip method and external method
Sun Jilei
Wu Yuanyi
Shao Zhiqiang
Lu Lifang
Wang Sujing
Yang Yong
Abstract：Objective:To compare the clinical efficacy and complication of Shang Ring circumcision by the no-flip method and the external method.Methods:From Jan.2016 to Oct.2016,a total of 158 outpatients with re-dundant prepuce or phimosis were selected and randomly divided into the no-flip group (n =78)and external group (n =80),and the patients with concealed penis,obvious adhesion,frenulum fusion and uncontrolled diabetes were excluded.The operation duration,pain score within 24 h,wound healing time,postoperative edema,incision in-fection,wound dehiscence and pain score when removing loop were compared.Results:The pain score within 24 h in the external group was significantly lower than in the no-flip group (P <0.05),while the score when removing loop in the external group was higher than that in the no-flip group (P <0.05).There were no statistically signifi-cant differences in the operation duration,wound healing time and complications between the two groups.Conclu-sions:Both the two surgical methods have the advantages of satisfactory clinical efficacy,short operation duration and low complication rate.The postoperative pain is slight in the external method,but there exists an obvious pain when removing loop.Conversely,the opposite occurs when using the no-flip method.
Keywords：Shang Ring circumcisionno-flip methodexternal method
Publication Date：2017-01-01
Online Publishing Date：2025-08-15(First online date of this platform, not the publication date of the document)
Pages：3( 371-373 )