Comparison of clinical application between traditional penile elongation and double“Z”modified penis surgery
Abstract：Objective To explore the differences and advantages&disadvantages of clinical application of traditional penile elongation and double“Z”modified penis surgery. Methods From February 2012 to Octo-ber 2014, 25 cases were treated by traditional penile elongation and 10 cases were treated by double“Z”modi-fied penis surgery. The differences and advantages&disadvantages were compared through incision design, fix-ation method, elongation effect, penis appearance, scar growth and subjective feeling. Results Two surgeries had the same good effect on penile lengthening, without significant clinical difference. The incision scar of the double"Z"modified penis surgery was small and concealed without destruction of the penis appearance. In the aspect of fixative firmness, the modified surgery was weaker than the traditional surgery, so the retraction risk was bigger. The incision scar of the traditional penile elongation was relatively obvious, the change of penis ap-pearance was relatively bigger, but the fixation was relatively firmer. Conclusion Two surgeries are the com-mon clinical surgeries for penis elongation at present. The different surgery is chosen before operation by differ-ent patients concern. The author thinks the modified surgery will be better than the traditional surgery if it solves the problem of fixative firmness.
Keywords：Penile elongationZ-shaped incisionZ-shaped flap
Publication Date：2015-01-01
Online Publishing Date：2025-08-15(First online date of this platform, not the publication date of the document)
Pages：3( 482-484 )