Analysis on efficacy and coincidence rate of cartridge microcolumn gel test in clinical blood transfusion test

Sun Liansheng; Li Hua; Zhang Long

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-7151.2025.03.019

Abstract：Objective To investigate the efficiency and coincidence rate of cartridge microcolumn gel test in clinical blood transfusion test.Methods The 617 patients undergoing blood transfusion test in Penglai People's Hospital of Yantai City during January to July 2024 were selected as research objects.The venous blood samples of all subjects were collected,and the cross matching was carried out using low ion condensed amine technology and cartridge microcolumn gel test,respectively.The test efficiencies,success rates of one-time blood matching,incidence of adverse reactions and coincidence rates between two methods were compared.Results The sensitivity,specificity,accuracy,positive predictive value and negative predictive value of cartridge microcolumn gel test were higher than those of low ion condensed amine technology(sensitivity:96.06%vs.85.10%;specificity:87.88%vs.63.64%;accuracy:95.62%vs.83.95%;positive predictive value:99.29%vs.97.64%;negative predictive value:55.77%vs.19.44%;all P<0.05),the success rate of one-time blood matching was higher than that of low ion condensed amine technology(91.57%vs.82.50%,P<0.05),the total incidence of adverse reactions was lower than that of low ion condensed amine technology(0.81%vs.2.43%,P<0.05),and the coincidence rates of primary and secondary sides were higher than those of low ion condensed amine technology(coincidence rate of primary side:91.90%vs.82.49%;coincidence rate of secondary side:90.60%vs.82.82%;P<0.05).Conclusion In the clinical blood transfusion test,cartridge microcolumn gel test has higher efficiency and coincidence rate,which could promote the safety of blood transfusion treatment.