Effect Observation between Single-hole Thoracoscopy and Three-holes Thoracoscopic Lobectomy in Treatment of Patients with Peripheral Lung Cancer
ZHOU Bin
LIU Chuan-bin
WANG Jia-fu
AN Shu-xiang
Abstract：Objective To investigate clinical effects of single-hole and three-holes thoracoscopic lobectomy in treatment of patients with peripheral lung cancer.Methods A total of 90 patients with peripheral lung cancer admitted during June 2014 and July 2015 were divided into single-hole resection group (n=50, single-Cavity thoracoscopic lobectomy) and three-holes resection group (n=40, three-holes thoracoscopic lobectomy) according to number of admission medical records.Perioperative indexes and incidence rates of postoperative complications were compared between the two groups.Results In single-hole resection group, operative time was significantly longer, while values of incision length and postoperative visual analogue scales (VAS) score were significantly lower than those in three-holes resection group (P<0.05).The total incidence rates of complication were 16% (8/40) in single-hole resection group and 35% (14/40) in three-holes resection group, and the difference in the total incidence rate of complications was statistically significant between the two groups (P<0.05).Conclusion Single-hole and three-holes thoracoscopic lobectomy in treatment of patients with peripheral lung cancer can achieve similar effect.Although operative time by single-hole thoracoscopic lobectomy is slightly longer, it can decrease incision length and degree of postoperative pain, and improve patients'' postoperative recovery.
Keywords：Lung neoplasmsPneumonectomyThoracoscopes
Publication Date：2017-01-01
Online Publishing Date：2025-08-15(First online date of this platform, not the publication date of the document)
Pages：4( 94-97 )