Rapid magnitude estimation based on multi-input Gaussian process regression
Zhao Qingxu
Wang Yanwei
Mo Hongyan
Cao Zhenzhong
Abstract:Accurate and rapid magnitude estimation is of paramount importance for earthquake early warning systems(EEWs).Traditional magnitude estimation methods based on a single characteristic parameter of the initial seismic wave are widely used in EEWs.However,these empirical formulae,established by a single characteristic parameter,fail to fully exploit the in-formation related to magnitude contained in the initial seismic wave,significantly limiting the effectiveness of magnitude estimation.To improve the accuracy of magnitude estimation in EEWs,this paper proposes a Gaussian process regression(GPR)based method that can estim-ate magnitudes in both scenarios:with and without hypocentral distance.The proposed meth-od,GPR-M,uses multiple characteristic parameters from the time domain,frequency do-main,and time-frequency domain as inputs,while GPR-M-R incorporates hypocentral dis-tance.Both methods estimate magnitude by integrating various aspects of information from the initial seismic wave.The study utilized 33 698 vertical acceleration records from the Japanese Kiban-Kyoshin Network(KiK-net)for training and testing,and 5353 vertical acceleration records from the Chilean Simulation Based Earthquake Risk and Resilience of Interdependent Systemsand Networks(SIBER-RISK)for generalization testing.Additionally,the method's practical application was validated using three typical earthquake cases in China,with MS5.4,MS6.4,and MS8.0.The performance of the GPR method was compared with the widely adop-ted τmaxp and Pd methods.The test results from the Japanese records indicate that for initial seis-mic waves of 3 to 10 s,both GPR-M and GPR-M-R outperform the τmaxp and Pd methods in magnitude estimation.Specifically,the standard deviation of estimation errors for the GPR-M method is reduced by approximately 52.53%to 61.20%compared with the τmaxp method,while the GPR-M-R method reduces the standard deviation of estimation errors by about 37.72%to 41.21%compared with the Pd method.For larger earthquakes(MW≥6.5),the magnitude sat-uration phenomenon is less pronounced in the GPR-M and GPR-M-R methods compared with the τmaxp and Pd methods.The accuracy of magnitude estimation for MW≥6.5 is improved by 1.4 to 1.5 times with the GPR-M method compared with the τmaxp method,and by 1.2 to 1.45 times with the GPR-M-R method compared with the Pd method.The test results from the Chilean data demonstrate that both the GPR-M and GPR-M-R methods can effectively estimate earthquake magnitudes in Chile.The standard deviation of estimation errors for the GPR-M method is reduced by approximately 53.08%to 55.13%compared with the τmaxp method,and the GPR-M-R method reduces the standard deviation of estimation errors by about 35.88%to 36.59%compared with the Pd method,showing excellent generalization capability.The test results from the three Chinese earthquake cases further confirmed that the GPR methods exhibit better accuracy and reliability compared with the τmaxp and Pd methods.The GPR method can significantly improve the accuracy of magnitude estimation in EEWs and is not affected by regional differences.In conclusion,this study presents a novel GPR-based magnitude estima-tion method that integrates multiple seismic wave features and optionally incorporates hypocent-ral distance information.The method demonstrates superior performance in terms of accuracy,reliability,and generalization ability compared with traditional single-parameter approaches.By effectively reducing estimation errors and mitigating magnitude saturation issues,particu-larly for larger earthquakes,the proposed GPR method offers significant potential for improv-ing the effectiveness of EEWs across diverse geographical regions.
Keywords:earthquake early warningmagnitude estimationmachine learningGaussian pro-cesses regression
Publication Date:2024-10-28
Online Publishing Date:2025-08-15(First online date of this platform, not the publication date of the document)
Pages:19( 806-824 )
Acta Seismologica Sinica

Acta Seismologica Sinica

ISTICPKUCSCD
ISSN:0253-3782
Year, Vol.(Issue):2024,46(5)